On June 16, 2009, the California Budget Conference Committee approved a package of “revenue raisers” to stave off the state’s budget deficit. Some of the provisions include:
- Increasing the personal income tax withholdings by 10% beginning January 1, 2010;
- Changing estimated tax payments again to accelerate revenue. Beginning in 2010, taxpayers would be required to pay:
- 1st quarter 30%
- 2nd quarter 40%
- 3rd quarter 0%
- 4th quarter 30%
- Imposing 3% independent contractor withholding, beginning January 1, 2010;
- Requiring 7% backup withholding on interest, dividends, and other income in conformity with the federal backup withholding rules;
- Increasing tobacco tax by $1.50 per pack beginning October 1, 2009;
- Imposing a new 9.9% oil severance tax beginning October 1, 2009;
- Repealing two corporation tax breaks passed in September 2008 before they take effect: NOL carrybacks and credit sharing among affiliated corporations;
- Extending sales tax requirement to certain out-of-state sellers, such as Amazon, that pay commissions to California firms;
- Allowing the state to suspend occupational and professional licenses for delinquent taxpayers;
- Suspending the Homeowners’ and Renters’ Assistance Program; and
- Enhancing collections by requiring banks and other financial institutions to match their account records with the FTB’s delinquency account records.
A quick review of these provisions shows that, with the exception of certain tobacco and oil taxes, these provisions do not increase revenue to the state, but only accelerate the collection of taxes from one fiscal year to another. This would seem to only defer the looming problem.
The Legislature should take up the budget package early next week, and all these provisions are subject to change, and Governor Schwarzenegger said he would veto any revenue proposals beyond those he had already included in his budget plan. The Governor is also opposed to withholding on independent contractors.
Filed under: Uncategorized
Via CPAWeb
The Internal Revenue Service has announced that the sales tax deduction available to new-car purchasers this year can also be taken in states that do not have a sales tax. This deduction can be taken by all taxpayers, either as an itemized deduction or as an addition to the standard deduction. "This special tax break is available for people purchasing a new car this year, and that can include people in states without a sales tax," IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman said in a statement.
Filed under: Tax Legislation
Via the Wall Street Journal
In a bid to gain better leverage to make sure paid tax preparers are qualified and ethical, IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman told the U.S. House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Oversight that the IRS is writing proposals that would require people who charge fees to prepare tax documents to be placed under some sort of licensing system.
Filed under: IRS, Licensing
Via Business Week
With upper-income tax rates set to increase in 2011, many firms are taking a look at ways to save taxes. Traditionally, many small firm have elected to be treated as an S-Corporation due to the simplicity of compliance, among other factors. This article from Business Week explores the trend of small firms looking into possible changes to C-Corporation status in the face of increased tax rates.
Filed under: Corporations, Tax
Via Investment News
The most current AMT patch exempts 26 million people from Alternative Minimum Tax, but is set to expire after 2009. So, as always, the future of the alternative minimum tax remains uncertain, Joseph W. Walloch writes in an InvestmentNews commentary. It is unclear what Congress will do for 2010 and beyond. Congress is not expected to repeal the AMT altogether.
Filed under: AMT, Tax, Tax Legislation
Via the AICPA
Based on recommendations form the Private Company Practice Section Reliability Task Force, the exposure draft includes three proposed standards:
- Framework and Objectives for Performing and Reporting on Compilation and Review Engagements
- Compilation of Financial Statements
- Review of Financial Statements
The full text of the exposure draft can be found here.
The PCPS task force recommended revising the standards to allow an accountant to issue a review report in situations where the accountant’s independence is impaired in connection with the performance of a nonattest service relating to the design or operation of an aspect of internal control over financial reporting.
According to the Journal of Accountancy article, significant changes to the standards would include:
-
- The introduction the new terms such as moderate assurance, review evidence and review risk to the review literature to harmonize with international review standards.
-
- A discussion of materiality in the context of a review engagement.
-
- A requirement that an accountant establish an understanding with management regarding the services to be performed through a written communication, that is, an engagement letter.
-
- The establishment of enhanced documentation requirements for compilation and review engagements.
-
- Guidance for practitioners who are engaged to perform a compilation or review engagement when they have also been engaged to perform nonattest services. The guidance includes reporting requirements for instances in which the accountant’s independence is impaired due to the performance of these services.
-
- The ability for an accountant to include a general description in the accountant’s compilation report regarding the reason(s) for an independence impairment.
Barry Melancon, president of the AICPA, has issued a brief explanatory video here.
The comment deadline is July 31 and the proposed effective date fo the changes is for financial statements for periods on or after December 15, 2010.
Filed under: CPA Professional Standards, Financial Statements
Via ABC News
President Barack Obama and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner announced plans for tax law overhauls intended to crack down on companies that avoid corporate taxes. The effort is expected to focus on tax laws that involve companies sending jobs overseas and on international tax shelters.
Filed under: Tax Legislation